AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 68 of 775

    Improve calculation for availability for long running downtime record

    In the customer project, there has been a long running downtime. For the metrics records, during the current shift period, the availability which should be 0 (since there is an active long downtime record) shows a value greater than 0. After the p...
    Nina NICHOLLS about 1 year ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Downtime 0 Future consideration

    Allow adjustment of quality balance

    The problem customer is facing is mismatching Quality Balance with Lot Group Balance. They would like to reset a given lot group such that Quality Balance = Lot Group Balance. Quality survey is not an option as it simply set the quality of the who...
    Nina NICHOLLS over 1 year ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Inventory / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

    Update Duration for manual downtimes

    In Ampla, duration is automatically updated only for open downtimes captured by Ampla (automatic). Manual open downtime durations are not updated automatically. Usually, a code item has to be written to update the duration of manual downtimes. Ref...
    Priyanka VINAYCHANDER about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Downtime 0 Future consideration

    BalanceByLotGroupAtPointInTime

    We need a way to get the inventory data at a point in time. Can we have a sample period filter that sets for a point in time and this would be applied to the Balance, Balance by lot/lot group views. Currently the only work around is to select Over...
    Kyriacous SAMATA over 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Client / Inventory 0 Future consideration

    Search in Catalogue

    Motivation Request from Technip: As the number of Class Libraries (or fragments) stored in the catalogue is growing, finding a given Class Library becomes harder. Proposed solution Provide a quick search in catalogue, searching in Class Library @i...
    Geoffrey Coad almost 4 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

    Support extensions in ISM with > 1024 characters

    Can we add an item onto the backlog to support extensions in ISM with > 1024 characters. Since we are using ISM for recording certain configuration, an example situation is a JSON template which may easily be larger than this, which will make a...
    Andy Davidson almost 4 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

    Create lots and lot groups with surveys

    Currently only a movement in/out of a lot/lotgroup will create a new lot/lotgroup. However there are many scenarios when a new lot/lotgroup will be introduced into the system using a survey event.BHP Chile has this scenario when start blasting a n...
    Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY over 4 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Inventory 1 Future consideration

    Tag Labels

    From Jon Tomkins. Following up on an old enhancement request from the Aussies on ISM. It may not be seen as high priority but wanted to flag a pain point for implementation – when we are attempting configuration management of compositions, as toda...
    Andy Davidson almost 3 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

    Required Version label is confusing

    From Jon Tonkins: If a version is set to something like 1.0.2.*, understand this actually means ‘use latest version’. This reads confusingly as it looks like it should only be 1.0.2.something but can then be 1.0.3, etc.
    Andy Davidson almost 3 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

    Evaluate fields when Quality moved forward

    Evaluated fields are not calculated when quality is moved forward. This would be an issue for the Material Accounting solution. In the configuration below, Re_SO4 for WorkCenter2 will not be evaluated for a QMF record. (We just need to run the eva...
    Priyanka VINAYCHANDER about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration