Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

Showing 32 of 859

Better layout for SMC

Resize columns to fit by default Allow sorting on any column Resize height of "Status" node under "Management Console" to fit
Elliott Middleton over 4 years ago in Historian & Client / Maintenance and Management 0 Submitted

HC Web: More granular control over who can view shared content

Currently, content can be shared with "All Users" or "No one". Need more granular control over how to share content, for example based on Windows/AD group membership or based on "Location"
Elliott Middleton over 4 years ago in Historian & Client / Historian Client Web (HCW) 0 Submitted

"aahIOSrvSvc" supports "Last" value from analog summary tags

Local summary tags are not exposed via "aahIOSrvSvc", but the corresponding “Live” query correctly returns the “Last” value from the summary tag. This came up via a support case from Aya Helmy Mohamed Mohamed
Elliott Middleton over 4 years ago in Historian & Client / Retrieval 0 Submitted

Tech Note for reverse proxy set up

Use NGINX as the basis Cover license manager, InTouch web, HC Web, etc. See ADO User Story 639350
Elliott Middleton over 5 years ago in Historian & Client / Install and Upgrade 1 Unlikely to implement

thresholds and specifications for MQ evaluated fields

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-2127 System Info]Ampla Versions: v7.3Operating System: N/A [Raised by]Customer Company: BMAContact: <rodney.banister@aveva.com> [Problem Summary] : In quality module customer need to have Specif...
Nina NICHOLLS over 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 1 Future consideration

Allow MQ overtime

It is common to have the quality of same lot change overtime due to chemical process in processing and leaching areas or further analysis of blocks in mine area. Currently we lack this functionality
Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY over 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 1 Future consideration

Deliver two cursors to see some values between cursors

Same as we have in Trend App, customer would like to have TWO cursors ( left & right ) to be able to retrieve some values between cursors.
Elliott Middleton over 5 years ago in Historian & Client / Historian Client Web (HCW) 0 Submitted

Quality reporting point X-Bar Chart sample size results in last charted value drop significantly

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1891 [System Info]Ampla Versions: 6.5MR1Operating System:Windows 2012 Server R2 [Raised by]Customer Company: RoyhillCF Status: StandardCustomer Contact: kehgan.hau@royhill.com.auSR Reference: 95117946...
Nina NICHOLLS about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

Material Quality line chart should not accumulate field values with the same sample period together

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1874 [System Info]Ampla Versions: 7.2 R2Operating System:Windows 2012 Server R2 [Raised by]Customer Company: RoyhillCF Status: StandardCustomer Contact: kehgan.hau@royhill.com.auSR Reference: 95117796...
Nina NICHOLLS over 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Charting / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

Allow Material to be a Source field for Material Quality Evaluated fields

For Material Quality Evaluated fields standard fields like Material cannot be added as Source. This would be useful for evaluating expressions, when a Material Quality reporting point is associated with more than one material. This was something t...
Priyanka VINAYCHANDER over 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration