AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 583

AVEVA NET Validation should ensure that there is no duplicate Class Names

A customer is using ISM to help configure AVEVA NET (AIM) and AVEVA Engineering and want to ensure that the Class Names are unique. Currently ISM only ensures uniquness at the ID level and that is usually within Context. As this is a fundamental w...
Geoffrey Coad over 2 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

Improve Search Criteria to identify IDS and Names in Corresponding Identifiers

Customer was searching for a letter having turned of the ID option in the search criteria however results are being returned whicvh includes this value in the Corrosponding Identifier (See Steps below for further details). We should improve the se...
Geoffrey Coad over 2 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

Change error level of the Movement Events with 0 or undetermined value from Error to Warning

There are many times when we capture automatic movements the accumulated value is 0 so the source quantity is 0. Or we want to move the available amount but the inventory is empty so we get an error. This means for each movement we always have to ...
Guest over 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Future consideration

New standard field to capture 'classified by' user

Business impact: It would be very helpful to have the "Classified By" field to capture the actual user info who classifies the record (a ny of the change makes to the fields Cause Location, Cause and Classification). This should be different to La...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 3 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / General 0 Future consideration

Allow the use of negatives at the start of Evaluated field expressions

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1583351 Customer creates an Evaluated Field with Evaluation expression starting with "minus" sign, for example -[Source1]. The project validates successfully but the repo...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 3 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 1 Will not implement

Two factor authentication for PA

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1663438 [System Info] Ampla Versions: v8.0 Operating System: N/A [Raised by] Customer Company: Glencore Clermont Coal Customer Contact: nagabhushanam.parepalli@aveva.com ...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 3 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 1 Future consideration

Additional DT CaptureDataWhen condition : EventStateConfirmOnAutoSplit

Business case: RTIO uses PI Asset Framework (AF) to auto classify Ampla Records. PI AF takes a few seconds to calculate the Cause, Classification, and Effect. So, an Ampla DT RP with a StartDelay of 30 seconds, would allow PI AF to carry out the n...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 3 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 1 Will not implement

Improve material/class constraint validation

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1708334 Global practice team found that no clear message to pinpoint the wrong configuration when material is deleted or not configured. Also validation did not pickup th...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 3 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 1 Future consideration

Make LDAP configrable at the point of installation

AD calls occurs over the LDAP protocol. When an object (user or group) resides in another domain, the domain controller sends a referral back. This means that it sends a pointer and the LDAP client (ISM) is required to contact the referred server ...
Geoffrey Coad almost 3 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

Request for year to be added to the runtime structure

We've previously added an additional "year" field to the runtime structure to track hours per year for a 7.5 project. I'd like to request an enhancement to OASyS 2021 to add "year" to the runtime structure please. I see that there's a runtimeyear....
Guest almost 3 years ago in Enterprise SCADA Server / Krunch and Data Manipulation / Realtime Schema 5 Will not implement