AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Future Consideration
Portfolio area Plant SCADA
Products Alarms
Created by Guest
Created on Apr 14, 2020

RELATED IDEAS

Native Hardware and Process Historical Alarm logging in SQL database

As current scenario, we can't log historical alarm into SQL database natively.

Using alarm category we can log but is has it own limitation.

Native functionality like Alarm Upload of CitectHistorian can be real upgrade for CitectSCADA as industry 4.0 is more about the data store and sharing.

Idea business value

To achieve this basic functionality, integrator\developer have to make serious changes in CitectSCADA function which leading to a random behaviour of CitectSCADA system.

Or integrator\developer needs to add another software as addon of CitectSCADA to achieve this functionality. Its concern for value of money\cost effectiveness.
Idea priority 4 – Important to my company
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Apr 17, 2020

    I agree, but you can do this with a simple SQL device for alarmlog and/or for sumalarm. I have been using it for long time (old versions had a problem with big tables, but now its solved). What is the limitation that you are talking about?

  • +16