AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 11 of 791

    Improve Gr Access toolkit

    Improve GrAccess toolki to support : Edit Security Edit ViewApp (Navigation, security features..) Allow to export as xml or text file Layout, screen profil, ViewApps, namespaces the same way as Industrial graphics Export Template definition (text ...
    Florent Michelfelder about 1 year ago in Application Server / GR 0

    System Platform and MS SQL Server versions visible in Properties \ Detail tab of the *.cab galaxy backup file

    Currently there is no straightforward way to find out the System Platform version and MS SQL Server version of the galaxy backup *.cab file. There is workaround that allow to find out this information: change the *cab extension to *.zip, open it a...
    Mariusz Dabrowski 6 months ago in Application Server / GR 1

    Improve Gr Access toolkit

    Enhance the Deployment function by adding a parameter that allows deployments to be performed without enabling ‘Preserve Runtime Changes". Currently, it is always enabled with no option to disable it.
    Kim Larsen 5 months ago in Application Server / GR 0

    Allow adjustment of quality balance

    The problem customer is facing is mismatching Quality Balance with Lot Group Balance. They would like to reset a given lot group such that Quality Balance = Lot Group Balance. Quality survey is not an option as it simply set the quality of the who...
    Nina NICHOLLS over 1 year ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Inventory / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

    Evaluate fields when Quality moved forward

    Evaluated fields are not calculated when quality is moved forward. This would be an issue for the Material Accounting solution. In the configuration below, Re_SO4 for WorkCenter2 will not be evaluated for a QMF record. (We just need to run the eva...
    Priyanka VINAYCHANDER about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

    Use destination material property should display fields from the destination

    Requested by BHP Chile Currently today when we set the use destination quality field if the field is present at the source then we display the destination value if the field is only present at the destination but not the source we do not see the f...
    Nina NICHOLLS over 3 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

    thresholds and specifications for MQ evaluated fields

    https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-2127 System Info]Ampla Versions: v7.3Operating System: N/A [Raised by]Customer Company: BMAContact: <rodney.banister@aveva.com> [Problem Summary] : In quality module customer need to have Specif...
    Nina NICHOLLS about 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 1 Future consideration

    Allow MQ overtime

    It is common to have the quality of same lot change overtime due to chemical process in processing and leaching areas or further analysis of blocks in mine area. Currently we lack this functionality
    Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY about 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 1 Future consideration

    Quality reporting point X-Bar Chart sample size results in last charted value drop significantly

    https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1891 [System Info]Ampla Versions: 6.5MR1Operating System:Windows 2012 Server R2 [Raised by]Customer Company: RoyhillCF Status: StandardCustomer Contact: kehgan.hau@royhill.com.auSR Reference: 95117946...
    Nina NICHOLLS almost 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

    Material Quality line chart should not accumulate field values with the same sample period together

    https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1874 [System Info]Ampla Versions: 7.2 R2Operating System:Windows 2012 Server R2 [Raised by]Customer Company: RoyhillCF Status: StandardCustomer Contact: kehgan.hau@royhill.com.auSR Reference: 95117796...
    Nina NICHOLLS about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Charting / Material Quality 0 Future consideration