Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

Showing 20 of 791

Add global equipment filter to the Plant SCADA Studio which applies to all tables

If you want to see the variable tags, trend tags, alarm or configuration parameters of one piece of equipment you have to apply an equipment filter for every type. If you could select an equipment filter in the top right of the Plant SCADA Studio ...
Guest 11 months ago in Plant SCADA / Equipment 0

The SA Treeview needs an option to hide the cluster node

One major use of clustering is for distributed processing on large sites. In this case it makes no sense for the cluster name to be part of the equipment tree as it may be arbitrarily assigned and named.
Guest about 1 year ago in Plant SCADA / Equipment 0 Submitted

Use TagInfoEx() to check whether an alarm exists

If you have an equipment type with an item and this creates a variable tag and an alarmtag you could use the TagInfoEx() function to check whether this item has an alarm defined. Let me give an example: Equipment:Motors.M1 Item:Run Variable Tag Na...
Guest almost 3 years ago in Plant SCADA / Equipment 0

Evaluate fields when Quality moved forward

Evaluated fields are not calculated when quality is moved forward. This would be an issue for the Material Accounting solution. In the configuration below, Re_SO4 for WorkCenter2 will not be evaluated for a QMF record. (We just need to run the eva...
Priyanka VINAYCHANDER about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

Use destination material property should display fields from the destination

Requested by BHP Chile Currently today when we set the use destination quality field if the field is present at the source then we display the destination value if the field is only present at the destination but not the source we do not see the f...
Nina NICHOLLS over 3 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

thresholds and specifications for MQ evaluated fields

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-2127 System Info]Ampla Versions: v7.3Operating System: N/A [Raised by]Customer Company: BMAContact: <rodney.banister@aveva.com> [Problem Summary] : In quality module customer need to have Specif...
Nina NICHOLLS about 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 1 Future consideration

Allow MQ overtime

It is common to have the quality of same lot change overtime due to chemical process in processing and leaching areas or further analysis of blocks in mine area. Currently we lack this functionality
Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY about 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 1 Future consideration

Quality reporting point X-Bar Chart sample size results in last charted value drop significantly

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1891 [System Info]Ampla Versions: 6.5MR1Operating System:Windows 2012 Server R2 [Raised by]Customer Company: RoyhillCF Status: StandardCustomer Contact: kehgan.hau@royhill.com.auSR Reference: 95117946...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

Material Quality line chart should not accumulate field values with the same sample period together

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1874 [System Info]Ampla Versions: 7.2 R2Operating System:Windows 2012 Server R2 [Raised by]Customer Company: RoyhillCF Status: StandardCustomer Contact: kehgan.hau@royhill.com.auSR Reference: 95117796...
Nina NICHOLLS about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Charting / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

Allow Material to be a Source field for Material Quality Evaluated fields

For Material Quality Evaluated fields standard fields like Material cannot be added as Source. This would be useful for evaluating expressions, when a Material Quality reporting point is associated with more than one material. This was something t...
Priyanka VINAYCHANDER over 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration