Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

Showing 34 of 837

AF Bulk Model Building - Limit Search to Specified Parent Node

Right now, you can limit which models are built by the AF Bulk Model Builder by using the wildcard search field. However, this only works if the search term is in the name of each AF Element. Some customer's AF hierarchies are not set up this way,...
Alexander Jenkins over 2 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Web Monitoring Client 0 Future consideration

While lost communication with RTU on DNP and resume the communication there should be backfillng of lost data in Edge Trend.

While lost communication with RTU on DNP and resume the communication there should be backfillng of lost data in Edge Trend. same as plant scada.
Guest over 1 year ago in Edge / Drivers/Protocols 0 Needs review

Increase number of decimal points on Statistics screen

Currently, the "Statistics" screen in Client only displays two decimal points of precision. We request that this be increased to help with tags that normally have very small values already (such as some vibrations for example). Screenshot attached.
Alexander Jenkins almost 3 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Model Builder Client 1 Evaluating

Be able to constrain a point using the bulk model builder or at templates

Request an enhancement to be able to constrain a point when using the bulk model builder. This would be used on some of our wind models and would help as we build out the 1000+ models. This might be better/more broadly accomplished by just allowin...
Alexander Jenkins almost 3 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Model Builder Client 0 Evaluating

Historian Point Administration Enhancements

From Alex Jenkins, 2020-04-06 Add search/filter for a specific point (had to scroll through alphabetically). It was ok since I was only looking for 6 points to update, but if there were a lot, this could be tedious. Be able to select only certain ...
Christian-Marc Pouyez almost 6 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Model Builder Client 1 Planned

Simple "model health" summary graphic showing status of all individual residuals within a model

Per the attached image, create a summary graphic to show the health of all tags within a model. This provides a simple "at a glance" view of the health of all underlying tags within a model, and can quickly highlight the tags that are contributing...
Guest over 4 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Web Monitoring Client 0 Future consideration

prescriptive actions as task list

Prescriptive actions are very relevant and frequently hard to read as displayed in 2 row text field. It would be great if this can be displayed as a clear task list with the possibility to expose also on APIs so it can be leveraged by other soluti...
Luca Bruni almost 3 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Web Monitoring Client 1 Planned

Evaluate fields when Quality moved forward

Evaluated fields are not calculated when quality is moved forward. This would be an issue for the Material Accounting solution. In the configuration below, Re_SO4 for WorkCenter2 will not be evaluated for a QMF record. (We just need to run the eva...
Priyanka VINAYCHANDER over 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

Use destination material property should display fields from the destination

Requested by BHP Chile Currently today when we set the use destination quality field if the field is present at the source then we display the destination value if the field is only present at the destination but not the source we do not see the f...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 4 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

thresholds and specifications for MQ evaluated fields

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-2127 System Info]Ampla Versions: v7.3Operating System: N/A [Raised by]Customer Company: BMAContact: <rodney.banister@aveva.com> [Problem Summary] : In quality module customer need to have Specif...
Nina NICHOLLS over 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 1 Future consideration