Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Long Term Servicing for PlantSCADA

Standard Term Servicing is provided by AVEVA for all Citect versions which includes 3 years of full support.

After the 3 years the following support is dropped.

  • Minor and Major version releases

  • Patches to address non-critical issues

  • Ability to request Hot Fixes

  • Testing of Microsoft Security Updates

Long Term Servicing is provided for other AVEVA SCADA platforms on the latest releases providing 5 years of full support.

Idea business value

Not providing LTS on PlantSCADA while providing it on other AVEVA SCADA systems may give the impression that PlantSCADA isn't being given as much attention than the other systems.

SCADA systems don't get updated as regularly as they should, on some systems this is because there is some risk in upgrading. Increasing the length of time incremental patches and improvements are being released may encourage people to apply these more often.

Having a reduced support period could discourage people to not apply MS patches to critical system as they haven't been tested to be compatible.

Idea priority 3 – Some use to my company
  • Attach files
      Drop here to upload
    • Mark Rogers
      Apr 30, 2025

      In my experience, too often a full version upgrade, which requires an uninstallation of the old version, will fail in a way that requires a clean install of Windows to fix. This means that in a non-trivial environment, a full version upgrade will only be considered alongside routine hardware replacements where the clean install is a requirement anyway.

      On top of this, it's unlikely that we will be doing the above on day one of a new PS release - our annual quiet periods tend to be at the end of the calendar year which means any new release will usually be nearly a year old. Which means that a 3yr support period equates to little over 2 years from install, and hardware is expected to last at least 3-4y before replacement.

      Therefore a 5y support period would be helpful (and would make Customer First an easier sell).

      3 years isn't very long for a product of this nature.

    • Guest
      Apr 30, 2025

      This would be very helpful for my projects in the critical infrastructure. Deploying a new major Plant SCADA release on hundreds of machines requires more than a year of planning, testing, and deployment. Installing an update has much less impact on our production platforms.

    • +4