Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Status Submitted
Portfolio area Plant SCADA
Created by Dan Helgeland
Created on Sep 2, 2026

Object oriented equipment editor with nested objects (equipments)

When having equipment types that are similiar, today you can either make a copy with the differences (hard to maintain) or for some cases making optional signals through the xml can be done.


What would be nice is to add an equipment type in another type, so that you can define a processvalue (PV) equipment type once, with trend / alarm and necessary tag structure once. Then in other equipment types instead of re-creating 10/15/20 times or however many signals you need, you paste the PV equipment type where most of the information is handled in that equipment type.

EquipmentType PV

processvalue with trend and alarm - no type

supporttag for alarmblocking - no type


EquipmentType Motor

PV1 - type PV

PV2 - type PV

CMD - no type


EquipmentType Motor_special

motor - type Motor

extrasignal1 - type PV

extrasignal2 - no type


Idea business value
  • Faster creation of new equipments with the use of predefined PV/SP/CMD/STS types ready for use. Less errors / headache maintaining similiar equipment types.

  • Less time creating tools outside of plant scada to handle tag generation.

  • Higher overall quality for end user.

Idea priority 4 – Important to my company
  • Attach files