Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Equipment editor use patterns

When creating Equipment types it will save a lot of time when it is possible to use pattern’s
For example when creating an alarm several Item’s need to be created with the same structure:
<alarm>_Suppression
<alarm>_Condition
<alarm>_Alarm
<alarm>_Suppressed alarm

Idea business value

Saves time

Idea priority 4 – Important to my company
  • Attach files
      Drop here to upload
    • Guest
      Reply
      |
      Apr 10, 2025

      As the other poster mentioned, nesting equip types would make life so much easier and greatly expand the equipment capabilities. This allows you to build a equipment 'device' made of multiple components (types). It also saves on a lot of repetition in entering the same equipment field data.

    • Guest
      Reply
      |
      Feb 10, 2023

      Maybe an option to implement the following, just to give an example:

      Create an eqtAlarm with the items already described (suppression etc.).

      Create an eqtMotor with an item of the eqtAlarm type.

      For every alarm of all pieces of equipment the same items are added.

      This would make it so much easier to use. It's more like a struct or the ability to nest equipment types. One level deep would be enough I guess.

    • +12