AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 56 of 776

    Temporarily add / overlay tags that are not included in a model, when analysing model OMR

    This is a direct request from an end-user. Sometimes there are tags outside of a model that will provide useful context to the analyst in reviewing an anomaly within Web Monitoring Client. At the moment this requires the user to separately a...
    Guest over 4 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Web Monitoring Client 0 Evaluating

    Bulk Model Builder - Add API Calls

    Is it possible to add API calls to interact with the bulk model builder? In other words, would it be possible to bulk create models from another, external utility (bypassing the PA UI) assuming all the required info was supplied via an API.
    Alexander Jenkins over 2 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Web Monitoring Client 0 Future consideration

    AF Bulk Model Building - Limit Search to Specified Parent Node

    Right now, you can limit which models are built by the AF Bulk Model Builder by using the wildcard search field. However, this only works if the search term is in the name of each AF Element. Some customer's AF hierarchies are not set up this way,...
    Alexander Jenkins over 2 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Web Monitoring Client 0 Future consideration

    Search in Catalogue

    Motivation Request from Technip: As the number of Class Libraries (or fragments) stored in the catalogue is growing, finding a given Class Library becomes harder. Proposed solution Provide a quick search in catalogue, searching in Class Library @i...
    Geoffrey Coad almost 4 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

    prescriptive actions as task list

    Prescriptive actions are very relevant and frequently hard to read as displayed in 2 row text field. It would be great if this can be displayed as a clear task list with the possibility to expose also on APIs so it can be leveraged by other soluti...
    Luca Bruni over 2 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Web Monitoring Client 1 Planned

    Simple "model health" summary graphic showing status of all individual residuals within a model

    Per the attached image, create a summary graphic to show the health of all tags within a model. This provides a simple "at a glance" view of the health of all underlying tags within a model, and can quickly highlight the tags that are contributing...
    Guest about 4 years ago in Predictive Analytics / Web Monitoring Client 0 Future consideration

    Support extensions in ISM with > 1024 characters

    Can we add an item onto the backlog to support extensions in ISM with > 1024 characters. Since we are using ISM for recording certain configuration, an example situation is a JSON template which may easily be larger than this, which will make a...
    Andy Davidson almost 4 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

    Tag Labels

    From Jon Tomkins. Following up on an old enhancement request from the Aussies on ISM. It may not be seen as high priority but wanted to flag a pain point for implementation – when we are attempting configuration management of compositions, as toda...
    Andy Davidson almost 3 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

    Required Version label is confusing

    From Jon Tonkins: If a version is set to something like 1.0.2.*, understand this actually means ‘use latest version’. This reads confusingly as it looks like it should only be 1.0.2.something but can then be 1.0.3, etc.
    Andy Davidson almost 3 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

    Naming/numbering counter for class ID

    The id for any id in ISM should be automatically generated based on naming rules.
    Andy Davidson about 3 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0 Planned