AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 30 of 776

    Improve calculation for availability for long running downtime record

    In the customer project, there has been a long running downtime. For the metrics records, during the current shift period, the availability which should be 0 (since there is an active long downtime record) shows a value greater than 0. After the p...
    Nina NICHOLLS about 1 year ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Downtime 0 Future consideration

    test2

    test
    Edward Thongphanith 8 months ago in Edge / Development Tools 0 Needs review

    Add Param to IoTView Driver INI Files to Disable UDrvCompareAddress Sorting

    On the SCADAPack, with 1500 points, it can take 2 minutes for the UDRVCompareAddress sort during IotView startup. This takes a long time for our users and I reached out to Larry asking if it was possible for us to disable the sorty. He says its no...
    Guest 9 months ago in Edge / Tags 0 Needs review

    Allow adjustment of quality balance

    The problem customer is facing is mismatching Quality Balance with Lot Group Balance. They would like to reset a given lot group such that Quality Balance = Lot Group Balance. Quality survey is not an option as it simply set the quality of the who...
    Nina NICHOLLS over 1 year ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Inventory / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

    Update Duration for manual downtimes

    In Ampla, duration is automatically updated only for open downtimes captured by Ampla (automatic). Manual open downtime durations are not updated automatically. Usually, a code item has to be written to update the duration of manual downtimes. Ref...
    Priyanka VINAYCHANDER about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Downtime 0 Future consideration

    BalanceByLotGroupAtPointInTime

    We need a way to get the inventory data at a point in time. Can we have a sample period filter that sets for a point in time and this would be applied to the Balance, Balance by lot/lot group views. Currently the only work around is to select Over...
    Kyriacous SAMATA over 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Client / Inventory 0 Future consideration

    While lost communication with RTU on DNP and resume the communication there should be backfillng of lost data in Edge Trend.

    While lost communication with RTU on DNP and resume the communication there should be backfillng of lost data in Edge Trend. same as plant scada.
    Guest about 1 year ago in Edge / Drivers/Protocols 0 Needs review

    Create lots and lot groups with surveys

    Currently only a movement in/out of a lot/lotgroup will create a new lot/lotgroup. However there are many scenarios when a new lot/lotgroup will be introduced into the system using a survey event.BHP Chile has this scenario when start blasting a n...
    Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY over 4 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Inventory 1 Future consideration

    Evaluate fields when Quality moved forward

    Evaluated fields are not calculated when quality is moved forward. This would be an issue for the Material Accounting solution. In the configuration below, Re_SO4 for WorkCenter2 will not be evaluated for a QMF record. (We just need to run the eva...
    Priyanka VINAYCHANDER about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration

    Evaluated fields for Material movement items

    Material movement items currently do not support evaluated fields. As a part of the Alcoa project, at a certain point in their design, which uses meter marks to capture movements, having evaluated fields on movements would have helped to work out ...
    Priyanka VINAYCHANDER over 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Configuration / Inventory 0 Future consideration