AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 184 of 776

    Quality over time

    Currently, we cannot have multiple quality events for a given lot (example) in the unfinalized period. This is very limiting, as in reality, projects do have multiple samples for a given lot, and the need for quality over time. The product today d...
    Priyanka VINAYCHANDER about 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Planned

    ADE permit to use symbols (),.-/

    On ADE, Address1 and Address2 fields in the Station table of ADE do not permit the use of symbols such as (),.-/, even though these characters can be part of legitimate addresses.
    Gerald Tseng over 1 year ago in Enterprise SCADA Server / ADE / PnT / MoC 0

    Allow filtering Inventory Error Messages

    There is a requirement from BHP to be able to find specific types of error. Unfortunately currently the ErrorMessage field cannot be set to be filterable
    Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY over 4 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Future consideration

    Ability to bulk configure (Relationship Matrix, Heirarchy)

    https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1892 https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1997 https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1913 [Raised by]Customer Company: Rio Tinto Iron OreCustomer Contact: Ben Jones [Enhancement Req...
    Nina NICHOLLS about 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Configuration 0 Future consideration

    Allow protocol specific extensibility of dnlist ADE Form

    The dnlist ADE form has protocol specifics built in for BSAP and Fisher ROC but does not allow any extensibility so it is difficult to add "Download by List" functionality to a new protocol (such as DNP3).
    Collin Heggerud over 1 year ago in Enterprise SCADA Server / ADE / PnT / MoC / Protocols and Commlines / Telemetry 1 Will not implement

    Partial Import/Export

    To allow engineers to configure different parts of an Ampla project and merge them safely.It is only a solution to allow multiple people work on the same solution. However if you could provide a multi engineering environment, this feature is not r...
    Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY over 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Future consideration

    First Classififer field

    Rio Tinto currently populates a custom field called 'First Classifier' that is populated when an operator enters cause,classification. Currently, this is achieved via action/code items dependent on RCEs generated by downtime reporting points. Rio ...
    Nina NICHOLLS over 3 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 2 Will not implement

    Add business rules to movement and quality events

    BHP requirements to highlight records that don't meet some business and validation rules
    Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY about 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Planned

    Testing as a Service

    Multiple customers have offered to share their test scripts with us to improve our ability to test usage that better matches customer environments.
    Jake Hawkes almost 2 years ago in Enterprise SCADA Server / API / SDK / Developer Relations / Cloud / Compile / Build  / Documentation / Interoperability / Other API/SDK / Security and DMZ 0 Reviewing

    KPI targets based on calendar loopkup should look at target for each sub period

    [Problem Summary]Merhnoosh have found an issue with calendar items used as a target for Metrics KPIs. When you have a calendar item bound to a period (ie daily target), and is used as a target for a metrics KPI, Ampla doesn’t calculate the correct...
    Nina NICHOLLS over 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Planned