Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 544

High Availability for Ampla

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1941 [Enhancement Request] Rio Tinto IO's IT raised the following questions about Ampla's current architecture and its support for High Availability."With the local-only database requirement, does tha...
Nina NICHOLLS over 4 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 1 Will not implement

Add Break and Continue statements to Cicode

Break and continue are 2 statements that are very common in programming languages. Break is used to jump out of a loop skipping the code below it and continue skips the remaining statements in the body of the loop and performs the next iteration o...
Guest over 4 years ago in Plant SCADA / Development Tools 0 Future Consideration

IEC-104

IEC60870-101 or IEC60870-104 are the serial and IP versions of what is sometimes refered to IEC-104. These are both part of the IEC60870-5 standard, whereas ICCP is IEC60870-6, and is different. IEC_62351 is a standard for securing the various pro...
Josie Liu over 4 years ago in Enterprise SCADA Server / Omnicomm / Protocols and Commlines / Telemetry 0 Reviewing

Filter on QMF vs MQ and CQ record

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1912966
Nina NICHOLLS over 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Client 0 Future consideration

Allow planning module to be used in metrics KPI resolver

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1877803 Allow planning module to be selected by metrics KPI resolver
Nina NICHOLLS over 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Metrics 0 Future consideration

Option to disable copying of comments on auto split

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1840711 Customer would like the option to configure if comments are copied when downtime records are split
Nina NICHOLLS over 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 1 Will not implement

Accumulator variable and action type should ignore negative transitions

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1808835 negative transitions should be ignored
Nina NICHOLLS over 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Future consideration

Improve copy paste behaviour for effective duration

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1881 [System Info]Ampla Versions: v7.1.743Operating System: N/A [Raised by]Customer Company: Coronado Curragh Pty LtdCustomer Contact: nagabhushanam.parepalli@aveva.com [Problem Summary]When copy the ...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Future consideration

Reflect changes in Permissible Attribute properties in Permissible Grid

When downloading a Permissible Grid from a class Library it only reflects the Atrribute properties and ignores the Permissible Attribute Properties. This is understandable where, for example, a name of a property might be changed at the permissabl...
Geoffrey Coad over 2 years ago in Information Standards Manager 0

Evaluate fields when Quality moved forward

Evaluated fields are not calculated when quality is moved forward. This would be an issue for the Material Accounting solution. In the configuration below, Re_SO4 for WorkCenter2 will not be evaluated for a QMF record. (We just need to run the eva...
Priyanka VINAYCHANDER almost 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration