Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

Showing 5 of 791

Analog field rawval should be replicated to non-owning sites

Client has observed that the ANALOG "rawval" field is not replicating to non-owning sites; and they expect this value to be replicated. Anything else relevant to this feature? There is an optional feature called the "Raw Data Enhancement" RAW_ENAB...
Guest about 2 years ago in Enterprise SCADA Server / Replication 2 Waiting for information

NMC should not log confusing messages if the ADLDS Cross Domain Replication sender is also a receiver from another ADLDS realm

The current 2023 system designs being provided to customers include an es/deployment system with it's own ADLDS realm. AOR area/group changes are made there first and it is the global table owner for its realm. The primary production system is set...
Hugh Arai about 2 years ago in Enterprise SCADA Server / Administration / Installation / Replication 0 Reviewing

Support equipment type for multilanguage

Currently we have the display field for equipment type but does not obey this in PA. Looks like we tried to fix this a while ago but reverted the changes.
Nina NICHOLLS about 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / General 0 Future consideration

New standard field to capture 'classified by' user

Business impact: It would be very helpful to have the "Classified By" field to capture the actual user info who classifies the record (a ny of the change makes to the fields Cause Location, Cause and Classification). This should be different to La...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 4 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / General 0 Future consideration

Confirm for Inventory

allow confirm /un-confirm for Movement events and quality events
Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY almost 6 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / General / Inventory 0 Future consideration