Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ Products Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, select the product of your interest in the left column. Then take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas will first be moderated before they are made visible to other users of this portal.

This page is for feedback for specific AVEVA solutions, excluding PI Systems and Data Hub. For links to these other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Production Management (AMPLA MES)

Showing 148

Expose Ampla Configuration

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1916 [Raised by]Customer Company: Rio TintoCustomer Contact: Ben Jones (Ben.Jones@RioTinto.com) [Enhancement Request]Rio Tinto Iron Ore's ORDW team (Operational Datawarehouse) team requires access to ...
Matthew GRAHAM about 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Future consideration

Include relevant standard fields to work centers so they can have different names based on the location

Lot and Lot groups are concepts which don't have a meaning for customers but usually have a definition for them for each specific work center. For example in stock yard usually the Lot group is the stockpile name. Or in Cathode yard the cathode pa...
Mehrnoosh KHODAVERDY over 3 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 1 Will not implement

Make the diagnostic webservice public

[Problem Summary] Customer has been using the GetActiveSessions method in the Diagnostics web service through HTTP in 6.5. Most Ampla web service end points are available through both HTTP and NET.TCP. However, since their upgrade to 8.1, they hav...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Future consideration

High Availability for Ampla

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1941 [Enhancement Request] Rio Tinto IO's IT raised the following questions about Ampla's current architecture and its support for High Availability."With the local-only database requirement, does tha...
Nina NICHOLLS over 4 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 1 Will not implement

Improve copy paste behaviour for effective duration

https://schneiderampla.atlassian.net/browse/CE-1881 [System Info]Ampla Versions: v7.1.743Operating System: N/A [Raised by]Customer Company: Coronado Curragh Pty LtdCustomer Contact: nagabhushanam.parepalli@aveva.com [Problem Summary]When copy the ...
Nina NICHOLLS almost 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Future consideration

Filter on QMF vs MQ and CQ record

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1912966
Nina NICHOLLS over 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Client 0 Future consideration

Allow planning module to be used in metrics KPI resolver

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1877803 Allow planning module to be selected by metrics KPI resolver
Nina NICHOLLS over 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Metrics 0 Future consideration

Option to disable copying of comments on auto split

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1840711 Customer would like the option to configure if comments are copied when downtime records are split
Nina NICHOLLS over 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 1 Will not implement

Accumulator variable and action type should ignore negative transitions

https://dev.azure.com/AVEVA-VSTS/Issue%20Management%20System/_workitems/edit/1808835 negative transitions should be ignored
Nina NICHOLLS over 2 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) 0 Future consideration

Evaluate fields when Quality moved forward

Evaluated fields are not calculated when quality is moved forward. This would be an issue for the Material Accounting solution. In the configuration below, Re_SO4 for WorkCenter2 will not be evaluated for a QMF record. (We just need to run the eva...
Priyanka VINAYCHANDER almost 5 years ago in Production Management (AMPLA MES) / Material Quality 0 Future consideration